November 1st marked the beginning of Native American Heritage Month, situated in the middle of a season when many people are beginning to come together over food. As celebratory of a time as this may be for so many Americans, coming together with friends and family over hearty meals, it is important for us to acknowledge the complex history and current state of food access on Indigenous reservations.
For millennia, Native food systems nourished communities and cultures. From farming to fishing to harvesting wild rice, these food traditions are distinct, diverse and rich, molded and shaped by the unique geographies in which various indigenous communities live.
Many of the foods eaten today solely originated in the Americas. These Native American ingredients include beans, corn, cacao, vanilla, tomatoes, potatoes, squash, and chilies.
Beginning in the 1800s, federal policies displaced Indigenous communities- often on lands unfamiliar to them, and without the farming resources they were promised. The Cherokee Nation is just one of the Indigenous tribes affected by the troubled history of colonization. The Cherokee Nation’s first contact with European colonizers transpired in 1540 with Hernando DeSoto’s exploration of the Southeastern portion of North America, initiating a long pattern of erasing Cherokee culinary tradition. The erasure worsened when the Cherokee people were displaced from their lands and sent to reservations due to a number of treaties in 1835. In new and unfamiliar territories, the Cherokee were not given adequate resources to preserve and continue their traditional food systems. They had to depend on government rations, which resulted in a cycle of food insecurity that has increased dependency on food distribution programs even in the present day. The federal government’s food distribution programs– which are marked by inconsistent access to low-quality, highly processed food– drastically increased the prevalence of diabetes and correlated heart disease in Indigenous communities.
Farmlink is working with our partners at the Cherokee Nation alongside brands like Primal Kitchen and Land O’Lakes to alleviate the effects of the historic and ongoing pattern of marginalization and food insecurity. Primal Kitchen recently stated:
"Our donation partner, The Farmlink Project, continues to serve residents of the Cherokee Nations by providing nutritious, real food. This emerging project empowers these communities, sourcing from farmers with overstock, aging inventory, and donations. We are proud to say that this year Primal Kitchen has supplied The Farmlink Project with almost 40,000 lbs of our goods to these Nations.”
Farmlink is also currently collaborating with Land O’Lakes to conduct a survey with Indigenous nations about infrastructural support needed in reservations. As part of this effort, Land O’Lakes worked with Farmlink to confirm contacts and capacity in Indeginous reservations in the West Coast. Improvements in infrastructure, specifically refrigeration units, allows communities to regain control over food quality, storage, and distribution.
We hope that these efforts and this Indigenous people’s month serve as a reminder that the systemic problems created by historical colonization can be solved by the restoration of Indigenous communities’ autonomy.
Objective 1 engages with wasted food before the retail level, mainly incorporating USDA and EPA actions to build out food storage infrastructure, increase food donation, and invest in research to prevent food loss at the packaging and transportation level. The most important inclusion in Objective 1 was an added paragraph spotlighting Section 32 as a critical part of the nation’s food safety net. Section 32, a longstanding part of the 1935 Agricultural Adjustment Act (one of the first Farm Bills), uses agricultural customs receipts to fund the large-scale purchase of surplus produce from farmers and its transportation to hunger-fighting charities, schools, and other recipients nationwide. This program keeps millions of pounds of produce out of landfills each year, compensates farmers for their work, and fights food insecurity. Its inclusion as a food loss solution is critical to minimizing on-farm food loss while supporting farmers and reducing hunger. Objective 1 also indicates that the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) data can be used to identify points of surplus, an important expansion of current methods. Still, we will continue advocating for Farmlink and other food rescue organizations with existing, diverse networks of farmers and other food suppliers to be incorporated at a national level to better identify and address points of surplus food.
Farmlink is particularly excited about a new prioritization within Objective 2: “All projects aimed at increasing food rescue and donation should assess the quality, nutrition and appropriateness of the food being rescued, not just the quantity (e.g., consistent with Indigenous food sovereignty).” Since Farmlink’s founding, one of our core values has been to prioritize and maintain dignity associated with charitable food distribution, and a new emphasis on quality, nutrition, and appropriateness, especially in terms of indigenous food sovereignty, is a critical step to ensuring that the strategy is fighting hunger in an equitable, open-minded, and just way.
Objective 2 also now has the EPA's commitment to use life cycle assessment techniques to evaluate food waste prevention strategies, the results of which will inform consumer campaigns and incentives. They have also committed to refining and expanding food donation and recovery infrastructure through the Excess Food Opportunities Map. Farmlink will continue to advocate for the inclusion of food rescue organizations with existing networks and relationships to help expand these tools.
These changes are great. But how’s it all going to be funded?
During the comment process, Farmlink, as well as other food rescue organizations and coalitions, raised critical questions about how the strategy would be funded and, as a result, which measures are feasible. In particular, we hoped for more clarity beyond the draft’s statement that the USDA would use American Rescue Plan Act and Inflation Reduction Act funds and the EPA would use Bipartisan Infrastructure Law funds. Of the 86 programs or initiatives reviewed in the final strategy, only 15 are completely new programs announced in the strategy.
The other 71 are existing programs or initiatives that either already have a food loss and waste focus or that the national strategy has repackaged as food loss and waste solutions. While we had hopes of new, innovative programs being included in the strategy, the good news with these 71 programs is that most, if not all, are already funded, meaning that they are not reliant on an increasingly turbulent Congress for implementation. Of the 15 new programs, which included the EPA’s new consumer education campaign and several new cooperative agreements with land-grant universities, only 2 had specific funding mechanisms. It has become increasingly clear that food rescue organizations and other stakeholders in the food and agriculture space should not consider this strategy as a new rollout of FLW solutions, programs, and funding but rather as an evaluation of the current resources and solutions and how each can be most effectively utilized to achieve the strategy’s goals. In particular, the framing of many of USDA’s programs as FLW solutions offers opportunities to utilize existing funding, data, and infrastructure to solve one of the United States’s most pressing problems.
Whats next?
Now that we have the strategy, it’s time to truly take advantage of the opportunities it presents. In the immediate future at Farmlink, we’re excited to continue optimizing Section 32 as a critical on-farm food loss solution as we anticipate significant surplus recoveries in the fall. As we move forward, we continue to advocate for dignity with food distribution, emphasizing cultural appropriateness and quality in every pound of food we rescue. As outlined in our comments, food rescue organizations are critical stakeholders and thought partners for the agencies. Our inclusion in the strategy as such is an opportunity we are taking full advantage of to help guide federal action to support farmers, feed communities, and heal the planet.
< BackNovember 1st marked the beginning of Native American Heritage Month, situated in the middle of a season when many people are beginning to come together over food. As celebratory of a time as this may be for so many Americans, coming together with friends and family over hearty meals, it is important for us to acknowledge the complex history and current state of food access on Indigenous reservations.
For millennia, Native food systems nourished communities and cultures. From farming to fishing to harvesting wild rice, these food traditions are distinct, diverse and rich, molded and shaped by the unique geographies in which various indigenous communities live.
Many of the foods eaten today solely originated in the Americas. These Native American ingredients include beans, corn, cacao, vanilla, tomatoes, potatoes, squash, and chilies.
Beginning in the 1800s, federal policies displaced Indigenous communities- often on lands unfamiliar to them, and without the farming resources they were promised. The Cherokee Nation is just one of the Indigenous tribes affected by the troubled history of colonization. The Cherokee Nation’s first contact with European colonizers transpired in 1540 with Hernando DeSoto’s exploration of the Southeastern portion of North America, initiating a long pattern of erasing Cherokee culinary tradition. The erasure worsened when the Cherokee people were displaced from their lands and sent to reservations due to a number of treaties in 1835. In new and unfamiliar territories, the Cherokee were not given adequate resources to preserve and continue their traditional food systems. They had to depend on government rations, which resulted in a cycle of food insecurity that has increased dependency on food distribution programs even in the present day. The federal government’s food distribution programs– which are marked by inconsistent access to low-quality, highly processed food– drastically increased the prevalence of diabetes and correlated heart disease in Indigenous communities.
Farmlink is working with our partners at the Cherokee Nation alongside brands like Primal Kitchen and Land O’Lakes to alleviate the effects of the historic and ongoing pattern of marginalization and food insecurity. Primal Kitchen recently stated:
"Our donation partner, The Farmlink Project, continues to serve residents of the Cherokee Nations by providing nutritious, real food. This emerging project empowers these communities, sourcing from farmers with overstock, aging inventory, and donations. We are proud to say that this year Primal Kitchen has supplied The Farmlink Project with almost 40,000 lbs of our goods to these Nations.”
Farmlink is also currently collaborating with Land O’Lakes to conduct a survey with Indigenous nations about infrastructural support needed in reservations. As part of this effort, Land O’Lakes worked with Farmlink to confirm contacts and capacity in Indeginous reservations in the West Coast. Improvements in infrastructure, specifically refrigeration units, allows communities to regain control over food quality, storage, and distribution.
We hope that these efforts and this Indigenous people’s month serve as a reminder that the systemic problems created by historical colonization can be solved by the restoration of Indigenous communities’ autonomy.
National Native American Heritage Month
November 1st marked the beginning of Native American Heritage Month, situated in the middle of a season when many people are beginning to come together over food. As celebratory of a time as this may be for so many Americans, coming together with friends and family over hearty meals, it is important for us to acknowledge the complex history and current state of food access on Indigenous reservations.
For millennia, Native food systems nourished communities and cultures. From farming to fishing to harvesting wild rice, these food traditions are distinct, diverse and rich, molded and shaped by the unique geographies in which various indigenous communities live.
Many of the foods eaten today solely originated in the Americas. These Native American ingredients include beans, corn, cacao, vanilla, tomatoes, potatoes, squash, and chilies.
Beginning in the 1800s, federal policies displaced Indigenous communities- often on lands unfamiliar to them, and without the farming resources they were promised. The Cherokee Nation is just one of the Indigenous tribes affected by the troubled history of colonization. The Cherokee Nation’s first contact with European colonizers transpired in 1540 with Hernando DeSoto’s exploration of the Southeastern portion of North America, initiating a long pattern of erasing Cherokee culinary tradition. The erasure worsened when the Cherokee people were displaced from their lands and sent to reservations due to a number of treaties in 1835. In new and unfamiliar territories, the Cherokee were not given adequate resources to preserve and continue their traditional food systems. They had to depend on government rations, which resulted in a cycle of food insecurity that has increased dependency on food distribution programs even in the present day. The federal government’s food distribution programs– which are marked by inconsistent access to low-quality, highly processed food– drastically increased the prevalence of diabetes and correlated heart disease in Indigenous communities.
Farmlink is working with our partners at the Cherokee Nation alongside brands like Primal Kitchen and Land O’Lakes to alleviate the effects of the historic and ongoing pattern of marginalization and food insecurity. Primal Kitchen recently stated:
"Our donation partner, The Farmlink Project, continues to serve residents of the Cherokee Nations by providing nutritious, real food. This emerging project empowers these communities, sourcing from farmers with overstock, aging inventory, and donations. We are proud to say that this year Primal Kitchen has supplied The Farmlink Project with almost 40,000 lbs of our goods to these Nations.”
Farmlink is also currently collaborating with Land O’Lakes to conduct a survey with Indigenous nations about infrastructural support needed in reservations. As part of this effort, Land O’Lakes worked with Farmlink to confirm contacts and capacity in Indeginous reservations in the West Coast. Improvements in infrastructure, specifically refrigeration units, allows communities to regain control over food quality, storage, and distribution.
We hope that these efforts and this Indigenous people’s month serve as a reminder that the systemic problems created by historical colonization can be solved by the restoration of Indigenous communities’ autonomy.